The Affordable Care Act (ACA) Implementation FAQ Part 63, issued by the U.S. Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury focuses on the Public Health Service Act, which mandates that non-grandfathered group health plans and health insurance issuers provide culturally and linguistically appropriate summaries of benefits and coverage (SBC) and claims and appeals notices.
The regulations stipulate accommodations for notices in counties where more than 10 percent of the population is literate only in a specific non-English language, as determined by American Community Survey (ACS) data. Plans and issuers must offer oral language services, provide notices in the relevant non-English language upon request, and include a statement in English notices indicating how to access language services (referred to as taglines).
Non-grandfathered group health plans and issuers must adhere to the guidance for plan or policy years beginning on or after January 1, 2025. This guidance ensures that the provision of SBC and claims and appeals notices aligns with cultural and linguistic competence standards.
Employer Considerations
Employers should be prepared to point out to applicable employees the tagline to access language services found in English language SBCs and notices.
REDUCED INSULIN PRICES FOR SOME
UnitedHealth’s pharmacy benefit manager unit, Optum Rx, announced the inclusion of eight insulin products in its reimbursement list, limiting out-of-pocket expenses to $35 or less for enrollees. These products, including short- and rapid-acting insulin from Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi will be moved to tier one, the preferred status with the lowest prices, effective January 1, 2024. The move is part of an effort by these major insulin manufacturers, who collectively control 90 percent of the U.S. insulin market, to reduce list prices by 70 to 78 percent this year or in 2024. The Biden administration and lawmakers have been urging insulin makers and pharmacy benefit managers to address the high prices of this crucial medication.
Employer Considerations
Employers should check their insurers’ Rx formulary as more carriers may follow suit to lower insulin prices. Self-funded plans may consider making this change to remain competitive with fully funded plans.
BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD MOVES INTO DIRECT CARE DELIVERY
In 2023, various BlueCross BlueShield (BCBS) plans underwent reorganization, engaging in corporate restructuring, mergers and acquisitions, or establishing subsidiaries focused on healthcare delivery to enhance competitiveness with larger insurers.
BCBS plans have been expanding their presence in healthcare delivery by opening medical clinics exclusively serving their members. In Washington, Premera Blue Cross collaborated with Kinwell Medical Group in 2022 to establish primary care clinics for its members. BCBS Arizona took a similar approach in 2023, launching Prosano Health Solutions, a new primary care subsidiary, with plans to address specific geographic areas in Arizona to improve access to care.
BCBS North Carolina recently announced its intention to acquire 55 North Carolina locations of FastMed, a national chain offering preventive, telehealth, occupational health, primary care, and urgent care services. This move is aimed at enhancing healthcare services, particularly in rural areas with limited access to resources.
Employer ConsiderationsEmployers covered by BCBS should ask their insurance broker whether the carrier provides a direct care option near them.
CALIFORNIA TAKES A STEP TOWARD SINGLE-PAYER SYSTEM
Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 770, a significant step toward universal healthcare in California. The legislation directs the state’s Health and Human Services Agency to collaborate with the federal government to create a unified health financing system for all Californians. This move could pave the way for a single-payer system, covering every resident and funded by state and federal resources, including Medicaid and Medicare funds.
Senate Bill 770 aims to establish a uniform standard of healthcare accessible to all individuals, irrespective of factors such as age, income status, employment status, immigration status, and other variables. As California undergoes modifications in its Medi-Cal system, Michael Lighty, president of Healthy California Now, emphasizes that certain persisting issues can only be effectively addressed through comprehensive reforms across the entire healthcare system.
The law requires California’s health secretary to provide recommendations on crafting a federal waiver by June 1, 2024, potentially allowing the state to access federal financing for a universal healthcare system.
While the legislation faced opposition, including criticism from both the left and the right, it suggests an incremental approach to healthcare reform in California. The move aligns with Governor Newsom’s 2018 campaign promise of supporting a single-payer system. Despite the diverse opinions, the signing of SB 770 underscores California’s commitment to exploring avenues for achieving universal healthcare.
On November 9, 2023, Chicago replaced its existing paid sick leave ordinance with the Chicago Paid Leave and Paid Sick and Safe Leave ordinance, effective December 31, 2023. The new ordinance modifies the accrual system, allowing employees to earn one hour of paid sick leave plus one hour of paid leave for every 35 hours worked, with a yearly maximum of 40 hours of each. Employees can carry over 16 hours of accrued paid leave and 80 hours of accrued sick leave to the next benefit year. Alternatively, employers can front-load 40 hours of each at the start of each benefit year.
Unlike the prior ordinance, the new law mandates that accrued, unused leave be paid to employees upon termination or when no longer covered by the ordinance, subject to a phased approach based on employer size. Any excess leave beyond annual carryover limits is forfeited. New employees become eligible for paid sick leave after 30 days and paid leave after 90 days of employment. Paid leave can be used for any purpose, and employers cannot compel employees to disclose the reason.
Employer Considerations
Employers must comply with various notice and posting requirements, including providing written notice of the paid-time-off policy at the start of employment and before any changes. A 14-day notice of policy changes affecting final compensation must be given, and information about leave accrual and usage must be provided with each wage payment. Employers with Chicago-based employees should carefully review and adjust their sick leave and paid leave policies to align with the new ordinance, considering its differences from the previous paid sick leave ordinance and the upcoming statewide Paid Leave for All Workers Act.
QUESTION OF THE MONTH
Q: Can former employees who are on COBRA and paying monthly premiums to a TPA for COBRA deduct those premium amounts on their taxes? For example, if a person is on COBRA for three months in 2023, can they deduct COBRA premium payments from taxable income on their 2023 federal tax return?
A: Yes, COBRA premiums can be deducted on an individual’s federal income taxes provided they itemize their taxes and the person’s medical expenses (including COBRA premiums) exceed 7.5% of their adjusted gross income.
Answers to the Question of the Week are provided by Kutak Rock LLP. Kutak Rock provides general compliance guidance through the UBA Compliance Help Desk, which does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Please consult your legal advisor for specific legal advice.
This information is general in nature and provided for educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advice. You should not act on this information without consulting legal counsel or other knowledgeable advisors.
When the COVID-19 public health emergency and national emergency were declared in 2020, no one anticipated they would still be in place in 2023.
On January 30, 2023, the President announced the intent to end the emergencies on May 11, 2023. The impact of the emergencies on employer-sponsored benefits affected certain coverages, reimbursements, and timelines. Multiple laws and regulations passed after 2020 created temporary rules tied to the end of the emergencies. As a result, employers will face significant tasks and obligations to unwind the changes from the last three years.
There are two areas of significance for employers: free coverages that will end, and required deadlines that will begin. Here’s what you need to keep in mind for each:
1. Free coverages that will end
The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) required health plans to cover the cost of COVID-19 testing and related services with no cost-sharing. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) expanded the FFCRA by adding over-the-counter tests and vaccinations by out-of-network providers.
When the emergency ends, this required no-cost coverage of testing and related services will sunset. Employers with fully insured plans should speak with their carrier to discuss whether there will be any option to continue the coverage with no cost-sharing. Each state’s Department of Insurance should provide guidance to carriers on when cost-sharing will resume. Self-funded groups may have more flexibility to continue to offer testing and related services with no-cost sharing. Due to the Affordable Care Act’s preventative services requirement, fully approved COVID-19 vaccines will remain covered, without cost, by in-network providers. A reduction in coverage will require a 60-day advance notice to affected employees.
Another specific impact is stand-alone telehealth benefits. Employees who were ineligible for their employer’s health plan were permitted to enroll in stand-alone telehealth benefits. The relief applies for the plan year that begins on or before the end of the emergency. An employer providing stand-alone telehealth will not be able to continue the coverage past the end of the current plan year and should review their policy to modify the language for stand-alone coverage. A reduction in coverage requires sending a notice to affected employees 60 days prior to the plan year end date.
2. Required deadlines that will begin
Many provisions of the last three years are tied to outbreak period rules issued in May 2020. The outbreak period lasts until 60 days after the end of the national emergency. These rules extended several key deadlines related to COBRA, special enrollment periods, claim submission, and appeal processes.
The Employee Benefits Services Administration issued a notice in 2021 providing guidance and clarity for employers, stating that the maximum period a deadline may extend is the earlier of one year from the date an original deadline would begin, or 60 days after the end of the outbreak period. This one-year period is known as tolling.
The challenge for employers will be tracking each individual’s tolling period as the end of the outbreak period nears. For example, an employee traditionally has 60 days to elect COBRA continuation coverage. The 60-day deadline would not begin until one year and 60 days later or 60 days after the outbreak period.
To illustrate this, imagine this scenario:
Employee A’s benefits were terminated on December 31, 2022.
Traditionally, they would have until March 2023 to elect COBRA.
The relief states the 60-day countdown would not begin until the earlier of one year (December 2023) or July 10, 2023 (60 days after the end of the outbreak period).
Since the outbreak period end date is planned for May 11, 2023, which is earlier than the one-year tolling, Employee A must make their COBRA election by September 20, 2023.
The tolling period has been a point of confusion for employers and may be more confusing as the outbreak period now has a planned end date of May 11, 2023.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provided a roadmap on February 9, 2022, outlining what may and may not be affected by the end of the emergencies. HHS also indicated it will continue “to review the flexibilities and policies implemented during the COVID-19 PHE to determine whether others can and should remain in place, even for a temporary duration, to facilitate jurisdictions’ ability to provide care and resources to Americans.”
Employers and plan sponsors should continue monitoring federal and state government resources. Employers may need to revise plan documents and provide new notifications to employees when coverage is changed or eliminated.
By way of background, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) created the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) to study clinical effectiveness and health outcomes. To finance the Institute’s work, a small annual fee—commonly called the PCORI fee—is charged on group health plans. Grandfathered health plans are not exempt.
Most employers do not have to take any action because employer-sponsored health plans are commonly provided through group insurance contracts. For insured plans, the carrier is responsible for calculating and paying the PCORI fee and the employer has no additional duties.
However, employers that sponsor self-funded group health plans are responsible for calculating, reporting, and paying this fee each year.
The PCORI fee applies for each plan year based on the plan year end date. The fee is an annual amount multiplied by the number of plan participants.
$2.66 per year, per participant, for plan years ending between October 1, 2020 and September 30, 2021.
$2.79 per year, per participant, for plan years ending between October 1, 2021 and September 30, 2022.
Payment is due by July 31st in the following calendar year in which the plan year ends. Because the due date in 2022 falls on Sunday, you may file the return on the next business day. This year, payment is due on Monday, August 1, 2022. Use IRS Form 720, Quarterly Federal Excise Tax Return.
Does the PCORI fee apply to all health plans?
The fee applies to all health plans and HRAs, excluding the following:
Plans that primarily provide “excepted benefits” (e.g., stand-alone dental and vision plans, most health flexible spending accounts with little or no employer contributions, and certain supplemental or gap-type plans).
Plans that do not provide significant benefits for medical care or treatment (e.g., employee assistance, disease management, and wellness programs).
Stop-loss insurance policies.
Health savings accounts (HSAs).
The IRS provides a helpful chart indicating the types of health plans that are, or are not, subject to the PCORI fee.
Which quarter do self-funded employers report on by August 1st?
For the purposes of the 2022 PCORI obligations, this would be the 2nd Quarter of 2022. So, when completing Form 720 be sure to fill in the circle for “2nd Quarter.”
Caution! Before taking any action, confirm with your tax department or controller whether your organization files Form 720 for any purposes other than the PCORI fee. For instance, some employers use Form 720 to make quarterly payments for environmental taxes, fuel taxes, or other excise taxes. In that case, do not prepare Form 720 (or the payment voucher), but instead give the PCORI fee information to your organization’s tax preparer to include with its second quarterly filing.
If I have multiple self-insured plans, does the fee apply to each one?
Yes. For instance, if you self-insure one medical plan for active employees and another medical plan for retirees, you will need to calculate, report, and pay the fee for each plan. There is an exception, though, for “multiple self-insured arrangements” that are sponsored by the same employer, cover the same participants, and have the same plan year. For example, if you self-insure a medical plan with a self-insured prescription drug plan, you would pay the PCORI fee only once with respect to the combined plan.
What about hybrid plans such as level-funded or partially self-funded?
The terms “level-funded” or “partially self-funded” are not defined by law, so it can mean different things to different carriers, vendors, and employers. In most cases, the terms are intended to refer to a self-funded group medical plan sponsored by an employer who has assumed all financial risk, other than protection under stop-loss insurance. However, this is not absolute. If your hybrid plan is in fact self-funded plan, then the employer is responsible for the paying the PCORI fee. If unsure, check with the state’s insurance commissioner or legal counsel.
Does the fee apply to HRAs?
Yes. The PCORI fee applies to HRAs, which are self-insured health plans, although the fee is waived in some cases. If you self-insure another plan, such as a major medical or high deductible plan, and the HRA is merely a component of that plan, you do not have to pay the PCORI fee separately for the HRA. In other words, when the HRA is integrated with another self-insured plan, you only pay the fee once for the combined plan.
On the other hand, if the HRA stands alone, or if the HRA is integrated with an insured plan, you are responsible for paying the fee for the HRA.
What about QSEHRAs? Does the fee apply?
Yes. A Qualified Small Employer Health Reimbursement Arrangement (QSEHRA) is special type of tax-advantaged arrangement that allows small employers to reimburse certain health costs for their workers. Although a QSEHRA is not the same as an HRA, and the rules applying to each type are very different, a QSEHRA is a self-insured health plan for purposes of the PCORI fee. The IRS provides guidance confirming that small employers that offer QSEHRAs must calculate, report, and pay the PCORI fee.
What about ICHRAs and EBHRAs? Does the fee apply?
An Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangement (ICHRA) is a new type of tax-advantaged arrangement, first offered in 2020, that allows employers to reimburse certain health costs for their workers. The IRS has not provided specific guidance regarding ICHRAs and the PCORI fee, but it appears the fee applies since an ICHRA is a self-insured health plan.
An Excepted Benefits Health Reimbursement Arrangement (EBHRA) also is a self-insured health plan, but it is limited to “excepted benefits,” such as dental and vision care costs. So, the PCORI fee does not apply to EBHRAs.
Can I use ERISA plan assets or employee contributions to pay the fee?
No. The PCORI fee is an employer expense and not a plan expense, so you cannot use ERISA plan assets or employee contributions to pay the fee. (An exception is allowed for certain multiemployer plans (e.g., union trusts) subject to collective bargaining.) Since the fee is paid by the employer as a business expense, it is tax deductible.
How do I calculate the fee for a self-funded plan?
Multiply $2.66 or $2.79 (depending on the specific date the plan year ended in 2021) times the average number of lives covered during the plan year. “Covered lives” are all participants, including employees, dependents, retirees, and COBRA enrollees.
You may use any one of the following counting methods to determine the average number of lives:
Average Count Method: Count the number of lives covered on each day of the plan year, then divide by the number of days in the plan year.
Snapshot Method: Count the number of lives covered on the same day each quarter, then divide by the number of quarters (e.g., four). Or count the lives covered on the first of each month, then divide by the number of months (e.g., 12). This method also allows the option — called the “snapshot factor method” — of counting each primary enrollee (e.g., employee) with single coverage as “1” and counting each primary enrollee with family coverage as “2.35.”
Form 5500 Method: Add together the “beginning of plan year” and “end of plan year” participant counts reported on the Form 5500 for the plan year. There is no need to count dependents using this method since the IRS assumes the sum of the beginning and ending of year counts is close enough to the total number of covered lives. If the plan is employee-only without dependent coverage, divide the sum by 2. (If Form 5500 for the plan year ending in 2021 is not filed by August 1, 2022, you cannot use this counting method.) Note: For an HRA, QSEHRA or ICHRA, count only the number of primary participants (employees) and disregard any dependents.
How do I report and pay the fee for a self-funded plan?
Use Form 720, Quarterly Excise Tax Return, to report and pay the annual PCORI fee. Report all information for self-insured plan(s) with plan year ending dates in 2021 on the same Form 720. Do not submit more than one Form 720 for the same period with the same Employer Identification Number (EIN), unless you are filing an amended return.
Fill in the employer information at the top of the form.
In Part II, complete line 133(c) and/or line 133(d), as applicable, depending on the plan year ending date(s). If you are reporting multiple plans on the same line, combine the information.
In Part II, complete line 2 (total).
In Part III, complete lines 3 and 10.
Sign and date Form 720 where indicated.
If paying by check or money order, also complete the payment voucher (Form 720-V) provided on the last page of Form 720. Refer to the Instructions for mailing information.
Summary
If you self-insure one or more health plans or sponsor an HRA, you may be responsible for calculating, reporting, and paying annual PCORI fees. The fee is based on the average number of lives covered during the health plan year. The IRS offers a choice of different counting methods to calculate the plan’s average covered lives. Once you have determined the count, the process for reporting and paying the fee using Form 720 is fairly simple. For plan years ending in 2021, the deadline to file Form 720 and make your payment is August 1, 2022.
On June 19, 2018, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) published Frequently Asked Questions About Association Health Plans (AHPs) and issued a final rule that broadens the definition of “employer” and the provisions under which an employer group or association may be treated as an “employer” sponsor of a single multiple-employer employee welfare benefit plan and group health plan under Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
The final rule is intended to facilitate adoption and administration of AHPs and expand health coverage access to employees of small employers and certain self-employed individuals. Generally, it does this in four main ways:
It relaxes the requirement that group or association members share a common interest, as long as they operate in a common geographic area.
It confirms that groups or associations whose members operate in the same trade, industry, line of business, or profession can sponsor AHPs, regardless of geographic distribution.
It clarifies the existing requirement that groups or associations sponsoring AHPs must have at least one substantial business purpose unrelated to providing health coverage or other employee benefits.
It permits AHPs that meet the final rule’s new requirements to enroll working owners who do not have employees.
The final rule was effective on August 20, 2018.
The final rule applied to fully insured AHPs on September 1, 2018, to existing self-funded AHPs on January 1, 2019, and to new self-funded AHPs formed under this final rule on April 1, 2019.
The DOL used a staggered approach to implement this final rule so states and state insurance regulators would have time to tailor their regulations to the final rule and address a range of oversight and compliance assistance issues, especially concerns about self-funded AHPs’ vulnerability to financial mismanagement and abuse.
On March 28, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Court) found that the DOL’s final rule exceeded the statutory authority delegated by Congress under ERISA and that the final rule unlawfully expands ERISA’s scope. In particular, the Court found the final rule’s provisions – defining “employer” to include associations of disparate employers and expanding membership in these associations to include working owners without employees – are unlawful and must be set aside.
The Court’s order vacates the specific provisions of the DOL’s final rule regarding “bona fide group or association of employers,” “commonality of interest,” and “dual treatment of working owners as employers and employees.” The Court order sends the final rule back to the DOL to consider how the final rule’s severability provision affects the final rule’s remaining portions.
The Court’s order does not affect employers who formed AHPs under the DOL’s previous guidance regarding the definition of “employer.” Both existing and new employer groups or associations that meet the DOL’s pre-rule guidance can continue to sponsor an AHP.
This order stops employers from sponsoring new self-funded AHPs under the final rule beginning on April 1, 2019.
For an employer that relies on the final rule’s expanded definition of “employer” to currently sponsor a fully insured AHP or existing self-funded AHP, the employer should consult with its attorney as soon as possible. If the employer can meet the DOL’s pre-rule guidance, then it can continue to sponsor an AHP.
However, if the employer cannot meet the DOL’s pre-rule guidance, then the employer should consult with its attorney to determine whether it can amend its structure and plan document to meet the DOL’s pre-rule guidance. If it cannot meet the DOL’s pre-rule guidance through plan amendment, then the employer should consult with its attorny on how to proceed because the AHP will no longer qualify as an ERISA plan and may be subject to the ACA’s individual market and small group market rule as well as state regulation.
Although the DOL issued Questions and Answers after the Court’s decision, the DOL has not indicated how it will proceed. The DOL could revise its final rule or could appeal the decision and request that the Court stay its decision pending the appeal. Employers in AHPs should keep apprised of future developments in this case. Read the full Advisor
Since the ACA was enacted eight years ago, many employers are re-examining employee benefits in an effort to manage costs, navigate changing regulations, and expand their plan options. Self-funded plans are one way that’s happening.
In 2017, the UBA Health Plan survey revealed that self-funded plans have increased by 12.8% in the past year overall, and just less than two-thirds of all large employers’ plans are self-funded.
Here are six of the reasons why employers are opting for self-funded plans:
1. Lower operating costs frequently save employers money over time.
2. Employers paying their own claims are more likely to incentivize employee health maintenance, and these practices have clear, immediate benefits for everyone. 3. Increased control over plan dynamics often results in better individual fits, and more needs met effectively overall. 4. More flexibility means designing a plan that can ideally empower employees around their own health issues and priorities. 5. Customization allows employers to incorporate wellness programs in the workplace, which often means increased overall health.
6. Risks that might otherwise make self-funded plans less attractive can be managed through quality stop loss contracts.
If you want to know more about why self-funding can keep employers nimble, how risk can be minimized, and how to incorporate wellness programs, contact us for a copy of the full white paper, “Self-Funded Plans: A Solid Option for Small Businesses.”
